Plant UDP-galactose epimerases

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to an isolated nucleic acid fragment encoding a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase. The invention also relates to the construction of a chimeric gene encoding all or a portion of the UDP-galactose 4-epimerase, in sense or antisense orientation, wherein expression of the chimeric gene results in production of altered levels of the UDP-galactose 4-epimerase in a transformed host cell.

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.11/106,270, filed Apr. 14, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,294,162, issuedNov. 13, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.09/913,064, filed Aug. 8, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,992,236, issued Jan.31, 2006, which is a National Stage Application of PCT/US00/03453, filedFeb. 9, 2000, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional ApplicationNo. 60/119,588, filed Feb. 10, 1999.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the field of plant molecular biology. Morespecifically, this invention pertains to nucleic acid fragments encodingUDP-glucose modifiers in plants and seeds.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Raffinose saccharides are a group of D-galactose-containingoligosaccharides of sucrose that are widely distributed in plants.Raffinose saccharides are characterized by having the general formula:[O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→6)_(n)-α-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)-β-D-fructofuranosidewhere n=0 through n=4 are known respectively as sucrose, raffinose,stachyose, verbascose, and ajugose. The biosynthesis of raffinosesaccharides has been fairly well characterized [see Dey, P. M. InBiochemistry of Storage Carbohydrates in Green Plants (1985)]. Thecommitted reaction of raffinose saccharide biosynthesis involves thesynthesis of galactinol (O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1→1)-myo-inositol) fromUDP-galactose and myo-inositol. The enzyme that catalyzes this reactionis galactinol synthase. The flux of carbon through this reaction iscontrolled by the concentrations of the two substrates for the enzyme.Thus, while they are not unique to the raffinosaccharide pathway, theenzymes which produce these substrates serve to limit carbon flux to theraffinosaccharides.

UDP-glucose 4-epimerase (EC 5.1.3.2) is also called UDP-galactose4-epimerase. It is responsible for the interconversion of UDP-glucoseand UDP-galactose. UDP-galactose is a precursor of galactolipids andcell wall polysaccharides. When transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressingthe UDP-glucose 4-epimerase gene in sense or antisense orientation aregrown in soil, no changes in morphology or relative amounts of differentgalactose-containing compounds are detected. When the plants are grownon agar plates in the presence of galactose, a decrease in enzymeactivity and an increase in the UDP-galactose content correlates with arepression of growth while the UDP-glucose content does not change.Changes in the amount of galactose in the cell wall is detected inplants with low UDP-Glucose epimerase activity grown on galactose, whilethere is no change in the cellulose content of the leaves (Dormann andBenning (1998) Plant J. 13:641-652).

The activity of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase appears to be particularlylimiting to carbon flux into the raffinosaccharide pathway, thereforefurther reduction of the activity of this enzyme by tissue- andtemporally-specific gene silencing should greatly decrease the levels ofraffinose and stachyose in seeds.

Changes in the expression of either UDP-glucose 4-epimerase will allowthe modification of the carbohydrate metabolism in transgenic plants.Modification of the expression of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase may result ingrains with reduced cell-wall constituents (fiber) and increased levelsof starch. This trait will add value for feed, food, and industrialapplications of the crops.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Changes in the expression of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase will allow themodification of the carbohydrate metabolism in transgenic plants.Modification of the expression of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase may result ingrains with reduced cell-wall constituents (fiber) and increased levelsof starch. This trait will add value for feed, food, and industrialapplications of the crops. For example, overexpression of UDP-glucose4-epimerase in soybean should yield crops with lower contents ofraffinose and stachyose and with significantly higher contents ofsucrose.

The present invention relates to isolated polynucleotides comprising anucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of at least 90 amino acidsthat has at least 95% identity based on the Clustal method of alignmentwhen compared to a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptide selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20,22, and 24. The present invention also relates to an isolatedpolynucleotide comprising the complement of the nucleotide sequencesdescribed above.

It is preferred that the isolated polynucleotide of the claimedinvention consists of a nucleic acid sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, and 23that codes for the polypeptide selected from the group consisting of SEQID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24. The presentinvention also relates to an isolated polynucleotide comprising anucleotide sequences of at least one of 60 (preferably at least one of40, most preferably at least one of 30) contiguous nucleotides derivedfrom a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23 and the complement of suchnucleotide sequences.

The present invention relates to a chimeric gene comprising an isolatedpolynucleotide of the present invention operably linked to suitableregulatory sequences.

The present invention relates to an isolated host cell comprising achimeric gene of the present invention or an isolated polynucleotide ofthe present invention. The host cell may be eukaryotic, such as a yeastor a plant cell, or prokaryotic, such as a bacterial cell. The presentinvention also relates to a virus, preferably a baculovirus, comprisingan isolated polynucleotide of the present invention or a chimeric geneof the present invention.

The present invention relates to a process for producing an isolatedhost cell comprising a chimeric gene of the present invention or anisolated polynucleotide of the present invention, the process comprisingeither transforming or transfecting an isolated compatible host cellwith a chimeric gene or isolated polynucleotide of the presentinvention.

The present invention relates to a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptideof at least 90 amino acids comprising at least 95% homology based on theClustal method of alignment compared to a polypeptide selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22,and 24.

The present invention relates to a method of selecting an isolatedpolynucleotide that affects the level of expression of a UDP-galactose4-epimerase polypeptide in a host cell, preferably a plant cell, themethod comprising the steps of: (a) constructing an isolatedpolynucleotide of the present invention or an isolated chimeric gene ofthe present invention; (b) introducing the isolated polynucleotide orthe isolated chimeric gene into a host cell; (c) measuring the level aUDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptide in the host cell containing theisolated polynucleotide; and (d) comparing the level of a UDP-galactose4-epimerase polypeptide in the host cell containing the isolatedpolynucleotide with the level of a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptidein the host cell that does not contain the isolated polynucleotide.

The present invention relates to a method of obtaining a nucleic acidfragment encoding a substantial portion of a UDP-galactose 4-epimerasepolypeptide, preferably a plant UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptide,comprising the steps of: synthesizing an oligonucleotide primercomprising a nucleotide sequence of at least one of 60 (preferably atleast one of 40, most preferably at least one of 30) contiguousnucleotides derived from a nucleotide sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23 andthe complement of such nucleotide sequences; and amplifying a nucleicacid fragment (preferably a cDNA inserted in a cloning vector) using theoligonucleotide primer. The amplified nucleic acid fragment preferablywill encode a portion of a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase amino acidsequence.

The present invention also relates to a method of obtaining a nucleicacid fragment encoding all or a substantial portion of the amino acidsequence encoding a UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polypeptide comprising thesteps of: probing a cDNA or genomic library with an isolatedpolynucleotide of the present invention; identifying a DNA clone thathybridizes with an isolated polynucleotide of the present invention;isolating the identified DNA clone; and sequencing the cDNA or genomicfragment that comprises the isolated DNA clone.

The present invention relates to a composition, such as a hybridizationmixture, comprising an isolated polynucleotide of the present invention.

The present invention relates to an isolated polynucleotide of thepresent invention comprising at least one of 30 contiguous nucleotidesderived from a nucleic acid sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and thecomplement of such sequences.

The present invention relates to an expression cassette comprising anisolated polynucleotide of the present invention operably linked to apromoter.

The present invention relates to a method for positive selection of atransformed cell comprising: (a) transforming a host cell with thechimeric gene of the present invention or an expression cassette of thepresent invention; and (b) growing the transformed host cell, preferablyplant cell, such as a monocot or a dicot, under conditions which allowexpression of the UDP-galactose 4-epimerase polynucleotide in an amountsufficient to complement a null mutant to provide a positive selectionmeans.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING AND SEQUENCE DESCRIPTIONS

The invention can be more fully understood from the following detaileddescription and the accompanying drawing and Sequence Listing which forma part of this application.

FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C show a comparison of the amino acid sequences of theUDP-glucose 4-epimerase from soybean clone sls2c.pk017.k22:fis (SEQ IDNO:14), wheat clone wdk5c.pk006.o4:fis (SEQ ID NO:16), corn clonecen3n.pk0155.b8:fis (SEQ ID NO:18), rice clone rlr2.pk0043.c3:fis (SEQID NO:20), soybean clone se6.pk0014.f12 (SEQ ID NO:22), Pisum sativum(NCBI General Identifier No. 1173555, SEQ ID NO:25) and Cyamopsistetragonoloba (NCBI General Identifier No. 3021357, SEQ ID NO:26). Aminoacids conserved among all sequences are indicated by an asterisk (*)above the alignment. Dashes are used by the program to maximize thealignment.

Table 1 lists the polypeptides that are described herein, thedesignation of the cDNA clones that comprise the nucleic acid fragmentsencoding polypeptides representing all or a substantial portion of thesepolypeptides, and the corresponding identifier (SEQ ID NO:) as used inthe attached Sequence Listing. The sequence descriptions and SequenceListing attached hereto comply with the rules governing nucleotideand/or amino acid sequence disclosures in patent applications as setforth in 37 C.F.R. §1.821-1.825.

TABLE 1 UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase SEQ ID NO: (Nucleo- (Amino ProteinClone Designation tide) Acid) Corn UDP-Galactose 4- cen3n.pk0155.b8 1 2Epimerase Rice UDP-Galactose 4- rlr2.pk0043.c3 3 4 Epimerase SoybeanUDP-Galactose sls2c.pk017.k22 5 6 4-Epimerase Wheat UDP-Galactosewdk5c.pk006.o4 7 8 4-Epimerase Corn UDP-Galactose 4- p0083.clddm72r 9 10Epimerase Rice UDP-Galactose 4- rls24.pk0008.d12 11 12 Epimerase SoybeanUDP-Galactose sls2c.pk017.k22:fis 13 14 4-Epimerase Wheat UDP-Galactosewdk5c.pk006.o4:fis 15 16 4-Epimerase Corn UDP-Galactose 4-cen3n.pk0155.b8:fis 17 18 Epimerase Rice UDP-Galactose 4-rlr2.pk0043.c3:fis 19 20 Epimerase Soybean UDP-Galactose se6.pk0014.f1221 22 4-Epimerase Wheat UDP-Galactose wlm0.pk0015.g3 23 24 4-Epimerase

The Sequence Listing contains the one letter code for nucleotidesequence characters and the three letter codes for amino acids asdefined in conformity with the IUPAC-IUBMB standards described inNucleic Acids Res. 13:3021-3030 (1985) and in the Biochemical J. 219(No. 2):345-373 (1984) which are herein incorporated by reference. Thesymbols and format used for nucleotide and amino acid sequence datacomply with the rules set forth in 37 C.F.R. §1.822.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In the context of this disclosure, a number of terms shall be utilized.As used herein, a “polynucleotide” is a nucleotide sequence such as anucleic acid fragment. A polynucleotide may be a polymer of RNA or DNAthat is single- or double-stranded, that optionally contains synthetic,non-natural or altered nucleotide bases. A polynucleotide in the form ofa polymer of DNA may be comprised of one or more segments of cDNA,genomic DNA, synthetic DNA, or mixtures thereof. An isolatedpolynucleotide of the present invention may include at least one of 60contiguous nucleotides, preferably at least one of 40 contiguousnucleotides, most preferably one of at least 30 contiguous nucleotidesderived from SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, orthe complement of such sequences.

As used herein, “substantially similar” refers to nucleic acid fragmentswherein changes in one or more nucleotide bases results in substitutionof one or more amino acids, but do not affect the functional propertiesof the polypeptide encoded by the nucleotide sequence. “Substantiallysimilar” also refers to nucleic acid fragments wherein changes in one ormore nucleotide bases does not affect the ability of the nucleic acidfragment to mediate alteration of gene expression by gene silencingthrough for example antisense or co-suppression technology.“Substantially similar” also refers to modifications of the nucleic acidfragments of the instant invention such as deletion or insertion of oneor more nucleotides that do not substantially affect the functionalproperties of the resulting transcript vis-à-vis the ability to mediategene silencing or alteration of the functional properties of theresulting protein molecule. It is therefore understood that theinvention encompasses more than the specific exemplary nucleotide oramino acid sequences and includes functional equivalents thereof.

Substantially similar nucleic acid fragments may be selected byscreening nucleic acid fragments representing subfragments ormodifications of the nucleic acid fragments of the instant invention,wherein one or more nucleotides are substituted, deleted and/orinserted, for their ability to affect the level of the polypeptideencoded by the unmodified nucleic acid fragment in a plant or plantcell. For example, a substantially similar nucleic acid fragmentrepresenting at least one of 30 contiguous nucleotides derived from theinstant nucleic acid fragment can be constructed and introduced into aplant or plant cell. The level of the polypeptide encoded by theunmodified nucleic acid fragment present in a plant or plant cellexposed to the substantially similar nucleic fragment can then becompared to the level of the polypeptide in a plant or plant cell thatis not exposed to the substantially similar nucleic acid fragment.

For example, it is well known in the art that antisense suppression andco-suppression of gene expression may be accomplished using nucleic acidfragments representing less than the entire coding region of a gene, andby nucleic acid fragments that do not share 100% sequence identity withthe gene to be suppressed. Moreover, alterations in a nucleic acidfragment which result in the production of a chemically equivalent aminoacid at a given site, but do not affect the functional properties of theencoded polypeptide, are well known in the art. Thus, a codon for theamino acid alanine, a hydrophobic amino acid, may be substituted by acodon encoding another less hydrophobic residue, such as glycine, or amore hydrophobic residue, such as valine, leucine, or isoleucine.Similarly, changes which result in substitution of one negativelycharged residue for another, such as aspartic acid for glutamic acid, orone positively charged residue for another, such as lysine for arginine,can also be expected to produce a functionally equivalent product.Nucleotide changes which result in alteration of the N-terminal andC-terminal portions of the polypeptide molecule would also not beexpected to alter the activity of the polypeptide. Each of the proposedmodifications is well within the routine skill in the art, as isdetermination of retention of biological activity of the encodedproducts. Consequently, an isolated polynucleotide comprising anucleotide sequence of at least one of 30 (preferably at least one of40, most preferably at least one of 60) contiguous nucleotides derivedfrom a nucleotide sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and the complement ofsuch nucleotide sequences may be used in methods of selecting anisolated polynucleotide that affects the expression of a UDP-galactose4-epimerase polypeptide in a host cell. A method of selecting anisolated polynucleotide that affects the level of expression of apolypeptide in a host cell (eukaryotic, such as plant or yeast,prokaryotic such as bacterial, or viral) may comprise the steps of:constructing an isolated polynucleotide of the present invention or anisolated chimeric gene of the present invention; introducing theisolated polynucleotide or the isolated chimeric gene into a host cell;measuring the level a polypeptide in the host cell containing theisolated polynucleotide; and comparing the level of a polypeptide in thehost cell containing the isolated polynucleotide with the level of apolypeptide in a host cell that does not contain the isolatedpolynucleotide.

Moreover, substantially similar nucleic acid fragments may also becharacterized by their ability to hybridize. Estimates of such homologyare provided by either DNA-DNA or DNA-RNA hybridization under conditionsof stringency as is well understood by those skilled in the art (Hamesand Higgins, Eds. (1985) Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, IRL Press, Oxford,U.K.). Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderatelysimilar fragments, such as homologous sequences from distantly relatedorganisms, to highly similar fragments, such as genes that duplicatefunctional enzymes from closely related organisms. Post-hybridizationwashes determine stringency conditions. One set of preferred conditionsuses a series of washes starting with 6×SSC, 0.5% SDS at roomtemperature for 15 min, then repeated with 2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 45° C. for30 min, and then repeated twice with 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 50° C. for 30min. A more preferred set of stringent conditions uses highertemperatures in which the washes are identical to those above except forthe temperature of the final two 30 min washes in 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS wasincreased to 60° C. Another preferred set of highly stringent conditionsuses two final washes in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C.

Substantially similar nucleic acid fragments of the instant inventionmay also be characterized by the percent identity of the amino acidsequences that they encode to the amino acid sequences disclosed herein,as determined by algorithms commonly employed by those skilled in thisart. Suitable nucleic acid fragments (isolated polynucleotides of thepresent invention) encode polypeptides that are at least about 70%identical, preferably at least about 80% identical to the amino acidsequences reported herein. Preferred nucleic acid fragments encode aminoacid sequences that are about 85% identical to the amino acid sequencesreported herein. More preferred nucleic acid fragments encode amino acidsequences that are at least about 90% identical to the amino acidsequences reported herein. Most preferred are nucleic acid fragmentsthat encode amino acid sequences that are at least about 95% identicalto the amino acid sequences reported herein. Suitable nucleic acidfragments not only have the above homologies but typically encode apolypeptide having at least 50 amino acids, preferably at least 100amino acids, more preferably at least 150 amino acids, still morepreferably at least 200 amino acids, and most preferably at least 250amino acids. Sequence alignments and percent identity calculations wereperformed using the Megalign program of the LASERGENE bioinformaticscomputing suite (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Multiple alignment of thesequences was performed using the Clustal method of alignment (Higginsand Sharp (1989) CABIOS. 5:151-153) with the default parameters (GAPPENALTY=10, GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Default parameters for pairwisealignments using the Clustal method were KTUPLE 1, GAP PENALTY=3,WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALS SAVED=5.

A “substantial portion” of an amino acid or nucleotide sequencecomprises an amino acid or a nucleotide sequence that is sufficient toafford putative identification of the protein or gene that the aminoacid or nucleotide sequence comprises. Amino acid and nucleotidesequences can be evaluated either manually by one skilled in the art, orby using computer-based sequence comparison and identification toolsthat employ algorithms such as BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool;Altschul et al. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410). In general, asequence of ten or more contiguous amino acids or thirty or morecontiguous nucleotides is necessary in order to putatively identify apolypeptide or nucleic acid sequence as homologous to a known protein orgene. Moreover, with respect to nucleotide sequences, gene-specificoligonucleotide probes comprising 30 or more contiguous nucleotides maybe used in sequence-dependent methods of gene identification (e.g.,Southern hybridization) and isolation (e.g., in situ hybridization ofbacterial colonies or bacteriophage plaques). In addition, shortoligonucleotides of 12 or more nucleotides may be used as amplificationprimers in PCR in order to obtain a particular nucleic acid fragmentcomprising the primers. Accordingly, a “substantial portion” of anucleotide sequence comprises a nucleotide sequence that will affordspecific identification and/or isolation of a nucleic acid fragmentcomprising the sequence. The instant specification teaches amino acidand nucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides that comprise one or moreparticular plant proteins. The skilled artisan, having the benefit ofthe sequences as reported herein, may now use all or a substantialportion of the disclosed sequences for purposes known to those skilledin this art. Accordingly, the instant invention comprises the completesequences as reported in the accompanying Sequence Listing, as well assubstantial portions of those sequences as defined above.

“Codon degeneracy” refers to divergence in the genetic code permittingvariation of the nucleotide sequence without affecting the amino acidsequence of an encoded polypeptide. Accordingly, the instant inventionrelates to any nucleic acid fragment comprising a nucleotide sequencethat encodes all or a substantial portion of the amino acid sequencesset forth herein. The skilled artisan is well aware of the “codon-bias”exhibited by a specific host cell in usage of nucleotide codons tospecify a given amino acid. Therefore, when synthesizing a nucleic acidfragment for improved expression in a host cell, it is desirable todesign the nucleic acid fragment such that its frequency of codon usageapproaches the frequency of preferred codon usage of the host cell.

“Synthetic nucleic acid fragments” can be assembled from oligonucleotidebuilding blocks that are chemically synthesized using procedures knownto those skilled in the art. These building blocks are ligated andannealed to form larger nucleic acid fragments which may then beenzymatically assembled to construct the entire desired nucleic acidfragment. “Chemically synthesized”, as related to nucleic acid fragment,means that the component nucleotides were assembled in vitro. Manualchemical synthesis of nucleic acid fragments may be accomplished usingwell established procedures, or automated chemical synthesis can beperformed using one of a number of commercially available machines.Accordingly, the nucleic acid fragments can be tailored for optimal geneexpression based on optimization of nucleotide sequence to reflect thecodon bias of the host cell. The skilled artisan appreciates thelikelihood of successful gene expression if codon usage is biasedtowards those codons favored by the host. Determination of preferredcodons can be based on a survey of genes derived from the host cellwhere sequence information is available.

“Gene” refers to a nucleic acid fragment that expresses a specificprotein, including regulatory sequences preceding (5′ non-codingsequences) and following (3′ non-coding sequences) the coding sequence.“Native gene” refers to a gene as found in nature with its ownregulatory sequences. “Chimeric gene” refers any gene that is not anative gene, comprising regulatory and coding sequences that are notfound together in nature. Accordingly, a chimeric gene may compriseregulatory sequences and coding sequences that are derived fromdifferent sources, or regulatory sequences and coding sequences derivedfrom the same source, but arranged in a manner different than that foundin nature. “Endogenous gene” refers to a native gene in its naturallocation in the genome of an organism. A “foreign” gene refers to a genenot normally found in the host organism, but that is introduced into thehost organism by gene transfer. Foreign genes can comprise native genesinserted into a non-native organism, or chimeric genes. A “transgene” isa gene that has been introduced into the genome by a transformationprocedure.

“Coding sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence that codes for aspecific amino acid sequence. “Regulatory sequences” refer to nucleotidesequences located upstream (5′ non-coding sequences), within, ordownstream (3′ non-coding sequences) of a coding sequence, and whichinfluence the transcription, RNA processing or stability, or translationof the associated coding sequence. Regulatory sequences may includepromoters, translation leader sequences, introns, and polyadenylationrecognition sequences.

“Promoter” refers to a nucleotide sequence capable of controlling theexpression of a coding sequence or functional RNA. In general, a codingsequence is located 3′ to a promoter sequence. The promoter sequenceconsists of proximal and more distal upstream elements, the latterelements often referred to as enhancers. Accordingly, an “enhancer” is anucleotide sequence which can stimulate promoter activity and may be aninnate element of the promoter or a heterologous element inserted toenhance the level or tissue-specificity of a promoter. Promoters may bederived in their entirety from a native gene, or be composed ofdifferent elements derived from different promoters found in nature, oreven comprise synthetic nucleotide segments. It is understood by thoseskilled in the art that different promoters may direct the expression ofa gene in different tissues or cell types, or at different stages ofdevelopment, or in response to different environmental conditions.Promoters which cause a nucleic acid fragment to be expressed in mostcell types at most times are commonly referred to as “constitutivepromoters”. New promoters of various types useful in plant cells areconstantly being discovered; numerous examples may be found in thecompilation by Okamuro and Goldberg (1989) Biochemistry of Plants15:1-82. It is further recognized that since in most cases the exactboundaries of regulatory sequences have not been completely defined,nucleic acid fragments of different lengths may have identical promoteractivity.

The “translation leader sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequencelocated between the promoter sequence of a gene and the coding sequence.The translation leader sequence is present in the fully processed mRNAupstream of the translation start sequence. The translation leadersequence may affect processing of the primary transcript to mRNA, mRNAstability or translation efficiency. Examples of translation leadersequences have been described (Turner and Foster (1995) Mol. Biotechnol.3:225-236).

The “3′ non-coding sequences” refer to nucleotide sequences locateddownstream of a coding sequence and include polyadenylation recognitionsequences and other sequences encoding regulatory signals capable ofaffecting mRNA processing or gene expression. The polyadenylation signalis usually characterized by affecting the addition of polyadenylic acidtracts to the 3′ end of the mRNA precursor. The use of different 3′non-coding sequences is exemplified by Ingelbrecht et al. (1989) PlantCell 1:671-680.

“RNA transcript” refers to the product resulting from RNApolymerase-catalyzed transcription of a DNA sequence. When the RNAtranscript is a perfect complementary copy of the DNA sequence, it isreferred to as the primary transcript or it may be a RNA sequencederived from posttranscriptional processing of the primary transcriptand is referred to as the mature RNA. “Messenger RNA (mRNA)” refers tothe RNA that is without introns and that can be translated intopolypeptide by the cell. “cDNA” refers to a double-stranded DNA that iscomplementary to and derived from mRNA. “Sense” RNA refers to an RNAtranscript that includes the mRNA and so can be translated into apolypeptide by the cell. “Antisense RNA” refers to an RNA transcriptthat is complementary to all or part of a target primary transcript ormRNA and that blocks the expression of a target gene (see U.S. Pat. No.5,107,065, incorporated herein by reference). The complementarity of anantisense RNA may be with any part of the specific nucleotide sequence,i.e., at the 5′ non-coding sequence, 3′ non-coding sequence, introns, orthe coding sequence. “Functional RNA” refers to sense RNA, antisenseRNA, ribozyme RNA, or other RNA that may not be translated but yet hasan effect on cellular processes.

The term “operably linked” refers to the association of two or morenucleic acid fragments on a single nucleic acid fragment so that thefunction of one is affected by the other. For example, a promoter isoperably linked with a coding sequence when it is capable of affectingthe expression of that coding sequence (i.e., that the coding sequenceis under the transcriptional control of the promoter). Coding sequencescan be operably linked to regulatory sequences in sense or antisenseorientation.

The term “expression”, as used herein, refers to the transcription andstable accumulation of sense (mRNA) or antisense RNA derived from thenucleic acid fragment of the invention. Expression may also refer totranslation of mRNA into a polypeptide. “Antisense inhibition” refers tothe production of antisense RNA transcripts capable of suppressing theexpression of the target protein. “Overexpression” refers to theproduction of a gene product in transgenic organisms that exceeds levelsof production in normal or non-transformed organisms. “Co-suppression”refers to the production of sense RNA transcripts capable of suppressingthe expression of identical or substantially similar foreign orendogenous genes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020, incorporated herein byreference).

“Altered levels” refers to the production of gene product(s) intransgenic organisms in amounts or proportions that differ from that ofnormal or non-transformed organisms.

“Mature” protein refers to a post-translationally processed polypeptide;i.e., one from which any pre- or propeptides present in the primarytranslation product have been removed. “Precursor” protein refers to theprimary product of translation of mRNA; i.e., with pre- and propeptidesstill present. Pre- and propeptides may be but are not limited tointracellular localization signals.

A “chloroplast transit peptide” is an amino acid sequence which istranslated in conjunction with a protein and directs the protein to thechloroplast or other plastid types present in the cell in which theprotein is made. “Chloroplast transit sequence” refers to a nucleotidesequence that encodes a chloroplast transit peptide. A “signal peptide”is an amino acid sequence which is translated in conjunction with aprotein and directs the protein to the secretory system (Chrispeels(1991) Ann. Rev. Plant Phys. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:21-53). If the proteinis to be directed to a vacuole, a vacuolar targeting signal (supra) canfurther be added, or if to the endoplasmic reticulum, an endoplasmicreticulum retention signal (supra) may be added. If the protein is to bedirected to the nucleus, any signal peptide present should be removedand instead a nuclear localization signal included (Raikhel (1992) PlantPhys. 100:1627-1632).

“Transformation” refers to the transfer of a nucleic acid fragment intothe genome of a host organism, resulting in genetically stableinheritance. Host organisms containing the transformed nucleic acidfragments are referred to as “transgenic” organisms. Examples of methodsof plant transformation include Agrobacterium-mediated transformation(De Blaere et al. (1987) Meth. Enzymol. 143:277) andparticle-accelerated or “gene gun” transformation technology (Klein etal. (1987) Nature (London) 327:70-73; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050,incorporated herein by reference).

Standard recombinant DNA and molecular cloning techniques used hereinare well known in the art and are described more fully in Sambrook etal. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, 1989 (hereinafter “Maniatis”).

Nucleic acid fragments encoding at least a portion of severalUDP-galactose 4-epimerases have been isolated and identified bycomparison of random plant cDNA sequences to public databases containingnucleotide and protein sequences using the BLAST algorithms well knownto those skilled in the art. The nucleic acid fragments of the instantinvention may be used to isolate cDNAs and genes encoding homologousproteins from the same or other plant species. Isolation of homologousgenes using sequence-dependent protocols is well known in the art.Examples of sequence-dependent protocols include, but are not limitedto, methods of nucleic acid hybridization, and methods of DNA and RNAamplification as exemplified by various uses of nucleic acidamplification technologies (e.g., polymerase chain reaction, ligasechain reaction).

For example, genes encoding other UDP-galactose 4-epimerases, either ascDNAs or genomic DNAs, could be isolated directly by using all or aportion of the instant nucleic acid fragments as DNA hybridizationprobes to screen libraries from any desired plant employing methodologywell known to those skilled in the art. Specific oligonucleotide probesbased upon the instant nucleic acid sequences can be designed andsynthesized by methods known in the art (Maniatis). Moreover, the entiresequences can be used directly to synthesize DNA probes by methods knownto the skilled artisan such as random primer DNA labeling, nicktranslation, or end-labeling techniques, or RNA probes using availablein vitro transcription systems. In addition, specific primers can bedesigned and used to amplify a part or all of the instant sequences. Theresulting amplification products can be labeled directly duringamplification reactions or labeled after amplification reactions, andused as probes to isolate full length cDNA or genomic fragments underconditions of appropriate stringency.

In addition, two short segments of the instant nucleic acid fragmentsmay be used in polymerase chain reaction protocols to amplify longernucleic acid fragments encoding homologous genes from DNA or RNA. Thepolymerase chain reaction may also be performed on a library of clonednucleic acid fragments wherein the sequence of one primer is derivedfrom the instant nucleic acid fragments, and the sequence of the otherprimer takes advantage of the presence of the polyadenylic acid tractsto the 3′ end of the mRNA precursor encoding plant genes. Alternatively,the second primer sequence may be based upon sequences derived from thecloning vector. For example, the skilled artisan can follow the RACEprotocol (Frohman et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8998-9002)to generate cDNAs by using PCR to amplify copies of the region between asingle point in the transcript and the 3′ or 5′ end. Primers oriented inthe 3′ and 5′ directions can be designed from the instant sequences.Using commercially available 3′ RACE or 5′ RACE systems (BRL), specific3′ or 5′ cDNA fragments can be isolated (Ohara et al. (1989) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 86:5673-5677; Loh et al. (1989) Science 243:217-220).Products generated by the 3′ and 5′ RACE procedures can be combined togenerate full-length cDNAs (Frohman and Martin (1989) Techniques 1:165).Consequently, a polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence of atleast one of 60 (preferably one of at least 40, most preferably one ofat least 30) contiguous nucleotides derived from a nucleotide sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13,15, 17, 19, 21, and 23 and the complement of such nucleotide sequencesmay be used in such methods to obtain a nucleic acid fragment encoding asubstantial portion of an amino acid sequence of a polypeptide. Thepresent invention relates to a method of obtaining a nucleic acidfragment encoding a substantial portion of a UDP-galactose 4-epimerasepolypeptide preferably a substantial portion of a plant UDP-galactose4-epimerase polypeptide, comprising the steps of: synthesizing anoligonucleotide primer comprising a nucleotide sequence of at least oneof 60 (preferably at least one of 40, most preferably at least one of30) contiguous nucleotides derived from a nucleotide sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17,19, 21, and 23, and the complement of such nucleotide sequences; andamplifying a nucleic acid fragment (preferably a cDNA inserted in acloning vector) using the oligonucleotide primer. The amplified nucleicacid fragment preferably will encode a portion of a UDP-galactose4-epimerase polypeptide.

Availability of the instant nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequencesfacilitates immunological screening of cDNA expression libraries.Synthetic peptides representing portions of the instant amino acidsequences may be synthesized. These peptides can be used to immunizeanimals to produce polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies with specificityfor peptides or proteins comprising the amino acid sequences. Theseantibodies can be then be used to screen cDNA expression libraries toisolate full-length cDNA clones of interest (Lerner (1984) Adv. Immunol.36:1-34; Maniatis).

The nucleic acid fragments of the instant invention may be used tocreate transgenic plants in which the disclosed polypeptides are presentat higher or lower levels than normal or in cell types or developmentalstages in which they are not normally found. This would have the effectof altering the level of cell wall and starch biosynthesis in thosecells. Modulation of the expression of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase can beused to control carbohydrate partitioning between cell wall and starchbiosynthesis. Changes in the expression of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase willallow the modification of the carbohydrate metabolism in transgenicplants. Modification of the expression of UDP-glucose 4-epimerase mayresult in grains with reduced cell-wall constituents (fiber) andincreased levels of starch. This trait will add value for feed, food,and industrial applications of the crops. For example, overexpression ofUDP-glucose 4-epimerase in soybean should yield crops with lowercontents of raffinose and stachyose and with significantly highercontents of sucrose.

Overexpression of the proteins of the instant invention may beaccomplished by first constructing a chimeric gene in which the codingregion is operably linked to a promoter capable of directing expressionof a gene in the desired tissues at the desired stage of development.The chimeric gene may comprise promoter sequences and translation leadersequences derived from the same genes. 3′ Non-coding sequences encodingtranscription termination signals may also be provided. The instantchimeric gene may also comprise one or more introns in order tofacilitate gene expression.

Plasmid vectors comprising the isolated polynucleotide (or chimericgene) may be constructed. The choice of plasmid vector is dependent uponthe method that will be used to transform host plants. The skilledartisan is well aware of the genetic elements that must be present onthe plasmid vector in order to successfully transform, select andpropagate host cells containing the chimeric gene. The skilled artisanwill also recognize that different independent transformation eventswill result in different levels and patterns of expression (Jones et al.(1985) EMBO J. 4:2411-2418; De Almeida et al. (1989) Mol. Gen. Genetics218:78-86), and thus that multiple events must be screened in order toobtain lines displaying the desired expression level and pattern. Suchscreening may be accomplished by Southern analysis of DNA, Northernanalysis of mRNA expression, Western analysis of protein expression, orphenotypic analysis.

For some applications it may be useful to direct the instantpolypeptides to different cellular compartments, or to facilitate itssecretion from the cell. It is thus envisioned that the chimeric genedescribed above may be further supplemented by directing the codingsequence to encode the instant polypeptides with appropriateintracellular targeting sequences such as transit sequences (Keegstra(1989) Cell 56:247-253), signal sequences or sequences encodingendoplasmic reticulum localization (Chrispeels (1991) Ann. Rev. PlantPhys. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:21-53), or nuclear localization signals(Raikhel (1992) Plant Phys. 100:1627-1632) with or without removingtargeting sequences that are already present. While the references citedgive examples of each of these, the list is not exhaustive and moretargeting signals of use may be discovered in the future.

It may also be desirable to reduce or eliminate expression of genesencoding the instant polypeptides in plants for some applications. Inorder to accomplish this, a chimeric gene designed for co-suppression ofthe instant polypeptide can be constructed by linking a gene or genefragment encoding that polypeptide to plant promoter sequences.Alternatively, a chimeric gene designed to express antisense RNA for allor part of the instant nucleic acid fragment can be constructed bylinking the gene or gene fragment in reverse orientation to plantpromoter sequences. Either the co-suppression or antisense chimericgenes could be introduced into plants via transformation whereinexpression of the corresponding endogenous genes are reduced oreliminated.

Molecular genetic solutions to the generation of plants with alteredgene expression have a decided advantage over more traditional plantbreeding approaches. Changes in plant phenotypes can be produced byspecifically inhibiting expression of one or more genes by antisenseinhibition or cosuppression (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,190,931, 5,107,065 and5,283,323). An antisense or cosuppression construct would act as adominant negative regulator of gene activity. While conventionalmutations can yield negative regulation of gene activity these effectsare most likely recessive. The dominant negative regulation availablewith a transgenic approach may be advantageous from a breedingperspective. In addition, the ability to restrict the expression ofspecific phenotype to the reproductive tissues of the plant by the useof tissue specific promoters may confer agronomic advantages relative toconventional mutations which may have an effect in all tissues in whicha mutant gene is ordinarily expressed.

The person skilled in the art will know that special considerations areassociated with the use of antisense or cosuppression technologies inorder to reduce expression of particular genes. For example, the properlevel of expression of sense or antisense genes may require the use ofdifferent chimeric genes utilizing different regulatory elements knownto the skilled artisan. Once transgenic plants are obtained by one ofthe methods described above, it will be necessary to screen individualtransgenics for those that most effectively display the desiredphenotype. Accordingly, the skilled artisan will develop methods forscreening large numbers of transformants. The nature of these screenswill generally be chosen on practical grounds. For example, one canscreen by looking for changes in gene expression by using antibodiesspecific for the protein encoded by the gene being suppressed, or onecould establish assays that specifically measure enzyme activity. Apreferred method will be one which allows large numbers of samples to beprocessed rapidly, since it will be expected that a large number oftransformants will be negative for the desired phenotype.

The instant polypeptides (or portions thereof) may be produced inheterologous host cells, particularly in the cells of microbial hosts,and can be used to prepare antibodies to the these proteins by methodswell known to those skilled in the art. The antibodies are useful fordetecting the polypeptides of the instant invention in situ in cells orin vitro in cell extracts. Preferred heterologous host cells forproduction of the instant polypeptides are microbial hosts. Microbialexpression systems and expression vectors containing regulatorysequences that direct high level expression of foreign proteins are wellknown to those skilled in the art. Any of these could be used toconstruct a chimeric gene for production of the instant polypeptides.This chimeric gene could then be introduced into appropriatemicroorganisms via transformation to provide high level expression ofthe encoded UDP-galactose 4-epimerase. An example of a vector for highlevel expression of the instant polypeptides in a bacterial host isprovided (Example 6).

All or a substantial portion of the nucleic acid fragments of theinstant invention may also be used as probes for genetically andphysically mapping the genes that they are a part of, and as markers fortraits linked to those genes. Such information may be useful in plantbreeding in order to develop lines with desired phenotypes. For example,the instant nucleic acid fragments may be used as restriction fragmentlength polymorphism (RFLP) markers. Southern blots (Maniatis) ofrestriction-digested plant genomic DNA may be probed with the nucleicacid fragments of the instant invention. The resulting banding patternsmay then be subjected to genetic analyses using computer programs suchas MapMaker (Lander et al. (1987) Genomics 1:174-181) in order toconstruct a genetic map. In addition, the nucleic acid fragments of theinstant invention may be used to probe Southern blots containingrestriction endonuclease-treated genomic DNAs of a set of individualsrepresenting parent and progeny of a defined genetic cross. Segregationof the DNA polymorphisms is noted and used to calculate the position ofthe instant nucleic acid sequence in the genetic map previously obtainedusing this population (Botstein et al. (1980) Am. J. Hum. Genet.32:314-331).

The production and use of plant gene-derived probes for use in geneticmapping is described in Bernatzky and Tanksley (1986) Plant Mol. Biol.Reporter 4:37-41. Numerous publications describe genetic mapping ofspecific cDNA clones using the methodology outlined above or variationsthereof. For example, F2 intercross populations, backcross populations,randomly mated populations, near isogenic lines, and other sets ofindividuals may be used for mapping. Such methodologies are well knownto those skilled in the art.

Nucleic acid probes derived from the instant nucleic acid sequences mayalso be used for physical mapping (i.e., placement of sequences onphysical maps; see Hoheisel et al. In: Nonmammalian Genomic Analysis: APractical Guide, Academic press 1996, pp. 319-346, and references citedtherein).

In another embodiment, nucleic acid probes derived from the instantnucleic acid sequences may be used in direct fluorescence in situhybridization (FISH) mapping (Trask (1991) Trends Genet. 7:149-154).Although current methods of FISH mapping favor use of large clones(several to several hundred KB; see Laan et al. (1995) Genome Res.5:13-20), improvements in sensitivity may allow performance of FISHmapping using shorter probes.

A variety of nucleic acid amplification-based methods of genetic andphysical mapping may be carried out using the instant nucleic acidsequences. Examples include allele-specific amplification (Kazazian(1989) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 11:95-96), polymorphism of PCR-amplifiedfragments (CAPS; Sheffield et al. (1993) Genomics 16:325-332),allele-specific ligation (Landegren et al. (1988) Science241:1077-1080), nucleotide extension reactions (Sokolov (1990) NucleicAcid Res. 18:3671), Radiation Hybrid Mapping (Walter et al. (1997) Nat.Genet. 7:22-28) and Happy Mapping (Dear and Cook (1989) Nucleic AcidRes. 17:6795-6807). For these methods, the sequence of a nucleic acidfragment is used to design and produce primer pairs for use in theamplification reaction or in primer extension reactions. The design ofsuch primers is well known to those skilled in the art. In methodsemploying PCR-based genetic mapping, it may be necessary to identify DNAsequence differences between the parents of the mapping cross in theregion corresponding to the instant nucleic acid sequence. This,however, is generally not necessary for mapping methods.

Loss of function mutant phenotypes may be identified for the instantcDNA clones either by targeted gene disruption protocols or byidentifying specific mutants for these genes contained in a maizepopulation carrying mutations in all possible genes (Ballinger andBenzer (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9402-9406; Koes et al.(1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8149-8153; Bensen et al. (1995)Plant Cell 7:75-84). The latter approach may be accomplished in twoways. First, short segments of the instant nucleic acid fragments may beused in polymerase chain reaction protocols in conjunction with amutation tag sequence primer on DNAs prepared from a population ofplants in which Mutator transposons or some other mutation-causing DNAelement has been introduced (see Bensen, supra). The amplification of aspecific DNA fragment with these primers indicates the insertion of themutation tag element in or near the plant gene encoding the instantpolypeptides. Alternatively, the instant nucleic acid fragment may beused as a hybridization probe against PCR amplification productsgenerated from the mutation population using the mutation tag sequenceprimer in conjunction with an arbitrary genomic site primer, such asthat for a restriction enzyme site-anchored synthetic adaptor. Witheither method, a plant containing a mutation in the endogenous geneencoding the instant polypeptides can be identified and obtained. Thismutant plant can then be used to determine or confirm the naturalfunction of the instant polypeptides disclosed herein.

EXAMPLES

The present invention is further defined in the following Examples, inwhich all parts and percentages are by weight and degrees are Celsius,unless otherwise stated. It should be understood that these Examples,while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given byway of illustration only. From the above discussion and these Examples,one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics ofthis invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof,can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt itto various usages and conditions.

Example 1 Composition of cDNA Libraries Isolation and Sequencing of cDNAClones

cDNA libraries representing mRNAs from various corn, rice, soybean, andwheat tissues were prepared. The characteristics of the libraries aredescribed below.

TABLE 2 cDNA Libraries from Corn, Rice, Soybean, and Wheat LibraryTissue Clone cen3n Corn Endosperm 20 Days cen3n.pk0155.b8 AfterPollination* p0083 Corn Whole Kernels 7 p0083.clddm72r Days AfterPollination rlr2 Rice Leaf 15 Days After rlr2.pk0043.c3 Germination, 2Hours After Infection of Strain Magaporthe grisea 4360-R-62 (AVR2-YAMO);Resistant rls24 Rice Leaf 15 Days After rls24.pk0008.d12 Germination, 24Hours After Infection of Strain Magaporthe grisea 4360-R-67 (AVR2-YAMO);Susceptible se6 Soybean Embryo, 26 Days se6.pk0014.f12 After Floweringsls2c Soybean Infected With sls2c.pk017.k22 Sclerotinia sclerotiorumMycelium wdk5c Wheat Developing Kernel, wdk5c.pk006.o4 30 Days AfterAnthesis wlm0 Wheat Seedlings 0 Hour wlm0.pk0015.g3 After InoculationWith Erysiphe graminis f. sp. tritici

cDNA libraries may be prepared by any one of many methods available. Forexample, the cDNAs may be introduced into plasmid vectors by firstpreparing the cDNA libraries in Uni-ZAP™ XR vectors according to themanufacturer's protocol (Stratagene Cloning Systems, La Jolla, Calif.).The Uni-ZAP™ XR libraries are converted into plasmid libraries accordingto the protocol provided by Stratagene. Upon conversion, cDNA insertswill be contained in the plasmid vector pBluescript. In addition, thecDNAs may be introduced directly into precut Bluescript II SK(+) vectors(Stratagene) using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs), followed bytransfection into DH10B cells according to the manufacturer's protocol(GIBCO BRL Products). Once the cDNA inserts are in plasmid vectors,plasmid DNAs are prepared from randomly picked bacterial coloniescontaining recombinant pBluescript plasmids, or the insert cDNAsequences are amplified via polymerase chain reaction using primersspecific for vector sequences flanking the inserted cDNA sequences.Amplified insert DNAs or plasmid DNAs are sequenced in dye-primersequencing reactions to generate partial cDNA sequences (expressedsequence tags or “ESTs”; see Adams et al., (1991) Science252:1651-1656). The resulting ESTs are analyzed using a Perkin ElmerModel 377 fluorescent sequencer.

Example 2 Identification of cDNA Clones

cDNA clones encoding UDP-galactose 4-epimerases were identified byconducting BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; Altschul et al.(1993) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410) searches for similarity to sequencescontained in the BLAST “nr” database (comprising all non-redundantGenBank CDS translations, sequences derived from the 3-dimensionalstructure Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, the last major release of theSWISS-PROT protein sequence database, EMBL, and DDBJ databases). ThecDNA sequences obtained in Example 1 were analyzed for similarity to allpublicly available DNA sequences contained in the “nr” database usingthe BLASTN algorithm provided by the National Center for BiotechnologyInformation (NCBI). The DNA sequences were translated in all readingframes and compared for similarity to all publicly available proteinsequences contained in the “nr” database using the BLASTX algorithm(Gish and States (1993) Nat. Genet. 3:266-272) provided by the NCBI. Forconvenience, the P-value (probability) of observing a match of a cDNAsequence to a sequence contained in the searched databases merely bychance as calculated by BLAST are reported herein as “pLog” values,which represent the negative of the logarithm of the reported P-value.Accordingly, the greater the pLog value, the greater the likelihood thatthe cDNA sequence and the BLAST “hit” represent homologous proteins.

Example 3 Characterization of cDNA Clones Encoding UDP-Galactose4-Epimerase

The BLASTX search using the EST sequences from clones listed in Table 3revealed similarity of the polypeptides encoded by the cDNAs toUDP-galactose 4-epimerase from Pisum sativum and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba(NCBI General Identifier No. 1173555 and 3021357, respectively). Shownin Table 3 are the BLAST results for individual ESTs (“EST”):

TABLE 3 BLAST Results for Sequences Encoding Polypeptides Homologous toUDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase BLAST pLog Score Clone Status 1173555 3021357cen3n.pk0155.b8 EST 76.00 90.40 rlr2.pk0043.c3 EST 24.10 35.52sls2c.pk017.k22 EST 66.52 40.40 wdk5c.pk006.o4 EST 68.70 40.40

The sequence of the entire cDNA insert in the clones mentioned above wasdetermined. Further analyses of the data indicated that there are twoforms of UDP-galactose 4-epimerase, a cytoplasmic form similar to thePisum sativum sequence, and a plastid form similar to the Cyamopsistetragonoloba sequence. ESTs encoding both kinds of UDP-galactose4-epimerases were found in the DuPont proprietary database. The BLASTsearch using the sequences from clones listed in Table 4 revealedsimilarity of the polypeptides encoded by the cDNAs to UDP-galactose4-epimerase (cytoplasmic) from Pisum sativum (NCBI General IdentifierNo. 1173555). Shown in Table 4 are the BLAST results for individual ESTs(“EST”), or for the sequences of the entire cDNA inserts comprising theindicated cDNA clones and encoding the entire protein (“CGS”):

TABLE 4 BLAST Results for Sequences Encoding Polypeptides Homologous toCytoplasmic UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase BLAST pLog Score Clone Status1173555 p0083.clddm72r EST 84.30 rls24.pk0008.d12 EST 26.10sls2c.pk017.k22:fis CGS >254.00 wdk5c.pk006.o4:fis CGS 154.00

The BLAST search using the sequences from clones listed in Table 5revealed similarity of the polypeptides encoded by the cDNAs toUDP-galactose 4-epimerase (plastid) from Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (NCBIGeneral Identifier No. 3021357). Shown in Table 5 are the BLAST resultsfor individual ESTs (“EST”), the sequences of the entire cDNA insertscomprising the indicated cDNA clones (“FIS”), or FIS sequences encodingthe entire protein (“CGS”):

TABLE 5 BLAST Results for Sequences Encoding Polypeptides Homologous toPlastid UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase BLAST pLog Score Clone Status 3021357cen3n.pk0155.b8:fis FIS 138.00 rlr2.pk0043.c3:fis CGS 165.00se6.pk0014.f12 CGS >254.00 wlm0.pk0015.g3 EST 21.00

FIGS. 1A, 1B and 1C present an alignment of the amino acid sequences setforth in SEQ ID NOs:14, 16, 18, and 22 and the Pisum sativum andCyamopsis tetragonoloba sequences (SEQ ID NO:25 and SEQ ID NO:26). Theamino acid sequence from clone cen3n.pk0155.b8:fis contains 353 aminoacids and the amino acid sequence from Cyamopsis tetragonoloba contains350 amino acids, but the alignment between both sequences starts atamino acid 65 of the Cyamopsis tetragonoloba sequence. The data in Table6 represents a calculation of the percent identity of the amino acidsequences set forth in SEQ ID NOs:2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20,22, and 24 and the Pisum sativum and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba sequences(SEQ ID NO:25 and SEQ ID NO:26).

TABLE 6 Percent Identity of Amino Acid Sequences Deduced From theNucleotide Sequences Sequences of cDNA Clones Encoding PolypeptidesHomologous UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerases Percent Identity to SEQ ID NO.1173555 3021357 2 66.3 77.5 4 52.5 67.7 6 79.1 53.4 8 66.0 54.9 10 56.353.3 12 47.5 44.4 14 90.0 64.9 16 71.1 62.6 18 56.3 64.3 20 64.3 78.9 2263.3 87.1 24 29.1 45.6

Sequence alignments and percent identity calculations were performedusing the Megalign program of the LASERGENE bioinformatics computingsuite (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Multiple alignment of the sequenceswas performed using the Clustal method of alignment (Higgins and Sharp(1989) CABIOS. 5:151-153) with the default parameters (GAP PENALTY=10,GAP LENGTH PENALTY=10). Default parameters for pairwise alignments usingthe Clustal method were KTUPLE 1, GAP PENALTY=3, WINDOW=5 and DIAGONALSSAVED=5. Sequence alignments and BLAST scores and probabilities indicatethat the nucleic acid fragments comprising the instant cDNA clonesencode a substantial portion or entire corn, rice, soybean, and wheatcytoplasmic UDP-galactose 4-epimerase and a substantial portion orentire corn, rice, soybean, and wheat plastidic UDP-galactose4-epimerase. These sequences represent the first corn, rice, soybean,and wheat sequences encoding UDP-galactose 4-epimerase.

Example 4 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Monocot Cells

A chimeric gene comprising a cDNA encoding the instant polypeptides insense orientation with respect to the maize 27 kD zein promoter that islocated 5′ to the cDNA fragment, and the 10 kD zein 3′ end that islocated 3′ to the cDNA fragment, can be constructed. The cDNA fragmentof this gene may be generated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of thecDNA clone using appropriate oligonucleotide primers. Cloning sites(NcoI or SmaI) can be incorporated into the oligonucleotides to provideproper orientation of the DNA fragment when inserted into the digestedvector pML103 as described below. Amplification is then performed in astandard PCR. The amplified DNA is then digested with restrictionenzymes NcoI and SmaI and fractionated on an agarose gel. Theappropriate band can be isolated from the gel and combined with a 4.9 kbNcoI-SmaI fragment of the plasmid pML103. Plasmid pML103 has beendeposited under the terms of the Budapest Treaty at ATCC (American TypeCulture Collection, 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, Va. 20110-2209),and bears accession number ATCC 97366. The DNA segment from pML103contains a 1.05 kb SalI-NcoI promoter fragment of the maize 27 kD zeingene and a 0.96 kb SmaI-SalI fragment from the 3′ end of the maize 10 kDzein gene in the vector pGem9Zf(+) (Promega). Vector and insert DNA canbe ligated at 15° C. overnight, essentially as described (Maniatis). Theligated DNA may then be used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue (EpicurianColi XL-1 Blue™; Stratagene). Bacterial transformants can be screened byrestriction enzyme digestion of plasmid DNA and limited nucleotidesequence analysis using the dideoxy chain termination method (Sequenase™DNA Sequencing Kit; U.S. Biochemical). The resulting plasmid constructwould comprise a chimeric gene encoding, in the 5′ to 3′ direction, themaize 27 kD zein promoter, a cDNA fragment encoding the instantpolypeptides, and the 10 kD zein 3′ region.

The chimeric gene described above can then be introduced into corn cellsby the following procedure. Immature corn embryos can be dissected fromdeveloping caryopses derived from crosses of the inbred corn lines H99and LH132. The embryos are isolated 10 to 11 days after pollination whenthey are 1.0 to 1.5 mm long. The embryos are then placed with theaxis-side facing down and in contact with agarose-solidified N6 medium(Chu et al. (1975) Sci. Sin. Peking 18:659-668). The embryos are kept inthe dark at 27° C. Friable embryogenic callus consisting ofundifferentiated masses of cells with somatic proembryoids and embryoidsborne on suspensor structures proliferates from the scutellum of theseimmature embryos. The embryogenic callus isolated from the primaryexplant can be cultured on N6 medium and sub-cultured on this mediumevery 2 to 3 weeks.

The plasmid, p35S/Ac (obtained from Dr. Peter Eckes, Hoechst Ag,Frankfurt, Germany) may be used in transformation experiments in orderto provide for a selectable marker. This plasmid contains the Pat gene(see European Patent Publication 0 242 236) which encodesphosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT). The enzyme PAT confersresistance to herbicidal glutamine synthetase inhibitors such asphosphinothricin. The pat gene in p35S/Ac is under the control of the35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (Odell et al. (1985) Nature313:810-812) and the 3′ region of the nopaline synthase gene from theT-DNA of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

The particle bombardment method (Klein et al. (1987) Nature 327:70-73)may be used to transfer genes to the callus culture cells. According tothis method, gold particles (1 μm in diameter) are coated with DNA usingthe following technique. Ten μg of plasmid DNAs are added to 50 μL of asuspension of gold particles (60 mg per mL). Calcium chloride (50 μL ofa 2.5 M solution) and spermidine free base (20 μL of a 1.0 M solution)are added to the particles. The suspension is vortexed during theaddition of these solutions. After 10 minutes, the tubes are brieflycentrifuged (5 sec at 15,000 rpm) and the supernatant removed. Theparticles are resuspended in 200 μL of absolute ethanol, centrifugedagain and the supernatant removed. The ethanol rinse is performed againand the particles resuspended in a final volume of 30 μL of ethanol. Analiquot (5 μL) of the DNA-coated gold particles can be placed in thecenter of a Kapton™ flying disc (Bio-Rad Labs). The particles are thenaccelerated into the corn tissue with a Biolistic™ PDS-1000/He (Bio-RadInstruments, Hercules Calif.), using a helium pressure of 1000 psi, agap distance of 0.5 cm and a flying distance of 1.0 cm.

For bombardment, the embryogenic tissue is placed on filter paper overagarose-solidified N6 medium. The tissue is arranged as a thin lawn andcovered a circular area of about 5 cm in diameter. The petri dishcontaining the tissue can be placed in the chamber of the PDS-1000/Heapproximately 8 cm from the stopping screen. The air in the chamber isthen evacuated to a vacuum of 28 inches of Hg. The macrocarrier isaccelerated with a helium shock wave using a rupture membrane thatbursts when the He pressure in the shock tube reaches 1000 psi.

Seven days after bombardment the tissue can be transferred to N6 mediumthat contains gluphosinate (2 mg per liter) and lacks casein or proline.The tissue continues to grow slowly on this medium. After an additional2 weeks the tissue can be transferred to fresh N6 medium containinggluphosinate. After 6 weeks, areas of about 1 cm in diameter of activelygrowing callus can be identified on some of the plates containing theglufosinate-supplemented medium. These calli may continue to grow whensub-cultured on the selective medium.

Plants can be regenerated from the transgenic callus by firsttransferring clusters of tissue to N6 medium supplemented with 0.2 mgper liter of 2,4-D. After two weeks the tissue can be transferred toregeneration medium (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technology 8:833-839).

Example 5 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Dicot Cells

A seed-specific expression cassette composed of the promoter andtranscription terminator from the gene encoding the β subunit of theseed storage protein phaseolin from the bean Phaseolus vulgaris (Doyleet al. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261:9228-9238) can be used for expressionof the instant polypeptides in transformed soybean. The phaseolincassette includes about 500 nucleotides upstream (5′) from thetranslation initiation codon and about 1650 nucleotides downstream (3′)from the translation stop codon of phaseolin. Between the 5′ and 3′regions are the unique restriction endonuclease sites Nco I (whichincludes the ATG translation initiation codon), Sma I, Kpn I and Xba I.The entire cassette is flanked by Hind III sites.

The cDNA fragment of this gene may be generated by polymerase chainreaction (PCR) of the cDNA clone using appropriate oligonucleotideprimers. Cloning sites can be incorporated into the oligonucleotides toprovide proper orientation of the DNA fragment when inserted into theexpression vector. Amplification is then performed as described above,and the isolated fragment is inserted into a pUC18 vector carrying theseed expression cassette.

Soybean embryos may then be transformed with the expression vectorcomprising sequences encoding the instant polypeptides. To inducesomatic embryos, cotyledons, 3-5 mm in length dissected from surfacesterilized, immature seeds of the soybean cultivar A2872, can becultured in the light or dark at 26° C. on an appropriate agar mediumfor 6-10 weeks. Somatic embryos which produce secondary embryos are thenexcised and placed into a suitable liquid medium. After repeatedselection for clusters of somatic embryos which multiplied as early,globular staged embryos, the suspensions are maintained as describedbelow.

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures can maintained in 35 mL liquidmedia on a rotary shaker, 150 rpm, at 26° C. with florescent lights on a16:8 hour day/night schedule. Cultures are subcultured every two weeksby inoculating approximately 35 mg of tissue into 35 mL of liquidmedium.

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures may then be transformed by themethod of particle gun bombardment (Klein et al. (1987) Nature (London)327:70-73, U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050). A DuPont Biolistic™ PDS1000/HEinstrument (helium retrofit) can be used for these transformations.

A selectable marker gene which can be used to facilitate soybeantransformation is a chimeric gene composed of the 35S promoter fromCauliflower Mosaic Virus (Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313:810-812), thehygromycin phosphotransferase gene from plasmid pJR225 (from E. coli;Gritz et al. (1983) Gene 25:179-188) and the 3′ region of the nopalinesynthase gene from the T-DNA of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacteriumtumefaciens. The seed expression cassette comprising the phaseolin 5′region, the fragment encoding the instant polypeptides and the phaseolin3′ region can be isolated as a restriction fragment. This fragment canthen be inserted into a unique restriction site of the vector carryingthe marker gene.

To 50 μL of a 60 mg/mL 1 μm gold particle suspension is added (inorder): 5 μL DNA (1 μg/μL), 20 μL spermidine (0.1 M), and 50 μL CaCl₂(2.5 M). The particle preparation is then agitated for three minutes,spun in a microfuge for 10 seconds and the supernatant removed. TheDNA-coated particles are then washed once in 400 μL 70% ethanol andresuspended in 40 μL of anhydrous ethanol. The DNA/particle suspensioncan be sonicated three times for one second each. Five μL of theDNA-coated gold particles are then loaded on each macro carrier disk.

Approximately 300-400 mg of a two-week-old suspension culture is placedin an empty 60×15 mm petri dish and the residual liquid removed from thetissue with a pipette. For each transformation experiment, approximately5-10 plates of tissue are normally bombarded. Membrane rupture pressureis set at 1100 psi and the chamber is evacuated to a vacuum of 28 inchesmercury. The tissue is placed approximately 3.5 inches away from theretaining screen and bombarded three times. Following bombardment, thetissue can be divided in half and placed back into liquid and culturedas described above.

Five to seven days post bombardment, the liquid media may be exchangedwith fresh media, and eleven to twelve days post bombardment with freshmedia containing 50 mg/mL hygromycin. This selective media can berefreshed weekly. Seven to eight weeks post bombardment, green,transformed tissue may be observed growing from untransformed, necroticembryogenic clusters. Isolated green tissue is removed and inoculatedinto individual flasks to generate new, clonally propagated, transformedembryogenic suspension cultures. Each new line may be treated as anindependent transformation event. These suspensions can then besubcultured and maintained as clusters of immature embryos orregenerated into whole plants by maturation and germination ofindividual somatic embryos.

Example 6 Expression of Chimeric Genes in Microbial Cells

The cDNAs encoding the instant polypeptides can be inserted into the T7E. coli expression vector pBT430. This vector is a derivative of pET-3a(Rosenberg et al. (1987) Gene 56:125-135) which employs thebacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase/T7 promoter system. Plasmid pBT430 wasconstructed by first destroying the EcoR I and Hind III sites in pET-3aat their original positions. An oligonucleotide adaptor containing EcoRI and Hind III sites was inserted at the BamH I site of pET-3a. Thiscreated pET-3aM with additional unique cloning sites for insertion ofgenes into the expression vector. Then, the Nde I site at the positionof translation initiation was converted to an Nco I site usingoligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. The DNA sequence of pET-3aM inthis region, 5′-CATATGG, was converted to 5′-CCCATGG in pBT430.

Plasmid DNA containing a cDNA may be appropriately digested to release anucleic acid fragment encoding the protein. This fragment may then bepurified on a 1% NuSieve GTG™ low melting agarose gel (FMC). Buffer andagarose contain 10 μg/ml ethidium bromide for visualization of the DNAfragment. The fragment can then be purified from the agarose gel bydigestion with GELase™ (Epicentre Technologies) according to themanufacturer's instructions, ethanol precipitated, dried and resuspendedin 20 μL of water. Appropriate oligonucleotide adapters may be ligatedto the fragment using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly,Mass.). The fragment containing the ligated adapters can be purifiedfrom the excess adapters using low melting agarose as described above.The vector pBT430 is digested, dephosphorylated with alkalinephosphatase (NEB) and deproteinized with phenol/chloroform as describedabove. The prepared vector pBT430 and fragment can then be ligated at16° C. for 15 hours followed by transformation into DH5 electrocompetentcells (GIBCO BRL). Transformants can be selected on agar platescontaining LB media and 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Transformants containingthe gene encoding the instant polypeptides are then screened for thecorrect orientation with respect to the T7 promoter by restrictionenzyme analysis.

For high level expression, a plasmid clone with the cDNA insert in thecorrect orientation relative to the T7 promoter can be transformed intoE. coli strain BL21 (DE3) (Studier et al. (1986) J. Mol. Biol.189:113-130). Cultures are grown in LB medium containing ampicillin (100mg/L) at 25° C. At an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 1, IPTG(isopropylthio-β-galactoside, the inducer) can be added to a finalconcentration of 0.4 mM and incubation can be continued for 3 h at 25°C. Cells are then harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended in 50 μLof 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0 containing 0.1 mM DTT and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. A small amount of 1 mm glass beads can be addedand the mixture sonicated 3 times for about 5 seconds each time with amicroprobe sonicator. The mixture is centrifuged and the proteinconcentration of the supernatant determined. One μg of protein from thesoluble fraction of the culture can be separated by SDS-polyacrylamidegel electrophoresis. Gels can be observed for protein bands migrating atthe expected molecular weight.

Example 7 Functional Expression of the Soybean UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerasein E. coli

Soybean varieties with inherently reduced raffinose saccharide contentwould improve the nutritional quality of derived soy protein productsand reduce processing costs associated with the removal of raffinosesaccharides. Said low raffinose saccharide soybean varieties would bemore valuable than conventional varieties for animal and human diets andwould allow mankind to more fully utilize the desirable nutritionalqualities of this edible legume.

Soybean clone sls2c.pk017.k22:fis (SEQ ID NO:14), encoding an almostentire UDP-galactose 4-epimerase, was cloned into a pET24d vector andtransformed into DH5∝ competent cells to determine its activity inmicrobial cells. The fragment encoding the soybean UDP-galactose4-epimerase was released from the BS-SK vector using restriction enzymesEco RI and Sma I which are located in the multiple cloning site of thevector. To obtain a blunt end, the Eco RI restriction site was filled-inusing T4 DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Nco I adapters (SEQ IDNO:27 and SEQ ID NO:28) containing a start methionine and threeadditional amino acids were ligated overnight at 16° C. to theblunt-ended UDP-galactose 4-epimerase fragment.

CATGGAGGAGCAG (SEQ ID NO: 27)     CTCCTCGTC (SEQ ID NO: 28)

After heat-inactivation of the ligase, adapter ends were phosphorylatedwith T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) for 30 minutes at37° C. The 1255 bp UDP-galactose 4-epimerase fragment was gel purifiedusing a 1% low melting agarose gel following manufacturers directions(FMC). The purified UDP-galactose 4-epimerase fragment containingphosphorylated Nco I adapter ends was ligated into an Nco I restrictedpET24d vector (Novagen) overnight at 16° C. The ligation was transformedinto DH5∝ competent cells and plated onto 2×YT/50 μg/mL kanamycinplates. Plasmid DNA was purified and screened for insert and orientationby restriction with Eco RI. A clone in the sense orientation withrespect to the T7 promoter and a clone with the insert in the antisenseorientation with respect to the T7 promoter (negative control) weretransformed into BL21 (DE3) competent cells (Novagen).

Single colonies were grown overnight at 37° C. in 2×YT medium containing50 μg/ml kanamycin. The cultures were diluted 30 fold in fresh mediumand allowed to grow for an additional 2 hours to an optical density (at600 nm) of 1.0. Expression of the cDNA insert was induced by addition ofisopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the cultures to a finalconcentration of 1 mM. Cells were harvested by centrifugation after 3hours and resuspended in 100 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate at pH 7.0containing 3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and 4 mMphenylmethylsulfonylfluoride. A small amount of 1 mm glass beads wereadded and the mixture was sonicated three times for about 5 seconds eachtime with a microprobe sonicator. The mixture was centrifuged and thesupernatant containing the protein transferred to a fresh tube.

For assay of UDP 4-epimerase activity the following components wereprepared in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0: 20 mM NADP, 200 mM sodiumpyrophosphate, 1 mM glucose 1,6 diphosphate, 0.5 mM DTTI, 1 unit/μLphosphoglucomutase, 1 unit/μL glucose 6-phosphate dehyrogenase, 0.05units/μL UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, 100 mM UDP-galactose and 0.04units/μL UDP-galactose 4-epimerase (SIGMA). Each 269 μL assay contained180 μL potassium phosphate buffer, 25 μL NADP, 5 μL sodiumpyrophosphate, 25 μL glucose 1,6 diphosphate, 1 μL DTT, 8 μLphosphoglucomutase, 1 μL glucose 6-pyrophosphorylase, and 20 μL cellextract (or UDP-galactose 4-epimerase). The reaction was initiated withthe addition of 2 μL 100 mM UDP-galactose and the production of NADPHwas followed by monitoring the absorbance at 340 nm using a ShimadzuUV160U spectrophotometer. A nine-fold increase in epimerase activity wasobserved in the vessels containing the soybean UDP-galactose 4-epimerasefragment in the sense orientation with respect to the T7 promoter overthose containing the soybean UDP-galactose 4-epimerase fragment in theantisense orientation with respect to the T7 promoter. As expected, anapproximately 37 kDa-expressed protein was observed in the solublefraction of the induced DE3 cells containing the sense construct ofpET24d-epimerase 4a.

Example 8 Functional Expression of the Soybean UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerasein Soybean Somatic Embryos

The ability to change the levels of the raffinosaccharide pathway byoverexpressing the gene from soybean clone sls2c.pk017.k22:fis insoybean somatic embryos was tested by preparing transgenic soybeansomatic embryos and assaying the raffinose, stachyose, and sucroselevels. A cosuppressed phenotype should have low to nondetectable levelsof raffinose and stachyose and increased levels of sucrose and can beexpressed as a ratio of sucrose/(raffinose+stachyose). A ratio of lessthan 1 is considered a wild type phenotype, while a ratio of greaterthan 2.0 is considered a cosuppressed event.

The entire insert from clone sls2c.pk017.k22:fis was amplified in astandard PCR reaction on a Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems GeneAmp PCRSystem using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene). The resulting fragment isbound by an Nco I site at the 5′ end and by a Pst I fragment at the 3′end. This fragment was digested, isolated, and ligated into the NcoI/Pst I sites of plasmid pKS18HH (described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,846,784)which had been modified by the insertion of the soybean glycinin subunitG1 promoter and terminator signals at the Sac I site. The sequence ofthe soybean Gy1 glycinin subunit G1 was published by Sims and Goldberg(1989, Nucl. Acids Res. 17:4386). The promoter sequence consists ofnucleotides 1 through 690 and the terminator sequence consists ofnucleotides 3126 through 3527. The new plasmid was named G1-epimeraseand contains the Gy1 promoter, the epimerase sequence, and the Gy1termination signal surrounded by Sac I sites in plasmid pKS18HH.

Transformation of Soybean Somatic Embryo Cultures

The following stock solutions and media were used for transformation andpropagation of soybean somatic embryos:

(g/L) Stock Solutions MS Sulfate 100× stock MgSO₄•7H₂O 37.0 MnSO₄•H₂O1.69 ZnSO₄•7H₂O 0.86 CuSO₄•5H₂O 0.0025 MS Halides 100× stock CaCl₂•2H₂O44.0 KI 0.083 CoCl₂•6H₂O 0.00125 KH₂PO₄ 17.0 H₃BO₃ 0.62 Na₂MoO₄•2H₂O0.025 Na₂EDTA 3.724 FeSO₄•7H₂O 2.784 B5 Vitamin stock myo-inositol 100.0nicotinic acid 1.0 pyridoxine HCl 1.0 thiamine 10.0 Media SB55 (perLiter) 10 ml of each MS stock 1 ml of B5 Vitamin stock 0.8 g NH₄NO₃3.033 g KNO₃ 1 ml 2,4-D (10 mg/mL stock) 0.667 g asparagine pH 5.7 SB103(per Liter) 1 pk. Murashige & Skoog salt mixture* 60 g maltose 2 ggelrite pH 5.7 SB148 (per Liter) 1 pk. Murashige & Skoog salt mixture*60 g maltose 1 mL B5 vitamin stock 7 g agarose pH 5.7 *(Gibco BRL)

Soybean embryonic suspension cultures were maintained in 35 mL liquidmedia (SB55) on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 28° C. with a mix offluorescent and incandescent lights providing a 16 h day 8 h nightcycle. Cultures were subcultured every 2 to 3 weeks by inoculatingapproximately 35 mg of tissue into 35 mL of fresh liquid media.

Soybean embryonic suspension cultures were transformed with G1-epimeraseby the method of particle gun bombardment (see Klein et al. (1987)Nature 327:70-73) using a DuPont Biolistic PDS1000/He instrument. FiveμL of G1-epimerase plasmid DNA (1 g/L), 50 μL CaCl₂ (2.5 M), and 20 μLspermidine (0.1 M) were added to 50 μL of a 60 mg/mL 1 mm gold particlesuspension. The particle preparation was agitated for 3 minutes, spun ina microfuge for 10 seconds and the supernate removed. The DNA-coatedparticles were then washed once with 400 μL of 70% ethanol andresuspended in 40 μL of anhydrous ethanol. The DNA/particle suspensionwas sonicated three times for 1 second each. Five μL of the DNA-coatedgold particles were then loaded on each macro carrier disk.

Approximately 300 to 400 mg of two-week-old suspension culture wasplaced in an empty 60 mm×15 mm petri dish and the residual liquidremoved from the tissue using a pipette. The tissue was placed about 3.5inches away from the retaining screen and bombarded twice. Membranerupture pressure was set at 1100 psi and the chamber was evacuated to−28 inches of Hg. Two plates were bombarded, and following bombardment,the tissue was divided in half, placed back into liquid media, andcultured as described above.

Fifteen days after bombardment, the liquid media was exchanged withfresh SB55 containing 50 mg/mL hygromycin. The selective media wasrefreshed weekly. Six weeks after bombardment, green, transformed tissuewas isolated and inoculated into flasks to generate new transformedembryonic suspension cultures.

Transformed embryonic clusters were removed from liquid culture mediaand placed on a solid agar media, SB103, containing 0.5% charcoal tobegin maturation. After 1 week, embryos were transferred to SB103 mediaminus charcoal. After 5 weeks on SB103 media, maturing embryos wereseparated and placed onto SB148 media. During maturation embryos werekept at 26° C. with a mix of fluorescent and incandescent lightsproviding a 16 h day 8 h night cycle. To mimic seed dry down, embryoswere harvested after 5 weeks on SB148 media. Each embryonic cluster gaverise to 5 to 20 somatic embryos.

Non-transformed somatic embryos were cultured by the same method as usedfor the transformed somatic embryos.

Analysis of Transformed Somatic Embryos

At the end of the 5^(th) week on SB148 medium somatic embryos wereharvested from 14 independently transformed lines. Soluble carbohydrateswere extracted by crushing the embryos with a nylon pestle in amicrofuge tube containing 200 μL of 80% methanol. Extraction wasrepeated with an additional 200 μL of 80% methanol and the supernatantscombined and dried. The soluble carbohydrates were resuspended in 200 μLwater and analyzed using a Dionex DX500 chromatography system.Carbohydrates were separated on a Dionex CarboPac PAI (4×250 mm) columnusing 95% 0.2 M NaOH, 5% water at 1.0 mL/min. A total of 14 events (10embryos each) were analyzed. The total area for the sugars raffinose,stachyose and sucrose were tabulated for each embryo. A cosuppressedphenotype should have low to nondetectable levels of raffinose andstachyose and increased levels of sucrose and can be expressed as aratio of sucrose/(raffinose+stachyose). A ratio of less than 1.0 isconsidered a wildtype phenotype, while a ratio of greater than 2.0 isconsidered a cosuppressed event. The averages and standard deviationsfor the areas of sucrose, raffinose, stachyose, and the ratio ofsucrose/(raffinose+stachyose) for each of the 14 samples are indicatedin Table 7:

TABLE 7 Averages and Standard Deviations of the Carbohydrates FromSomatic Soybean Embryos Expressing Chimeric Soybean UDP-Galactose4-Epimerases Sucrose/ Somatic (Raffinose + Embryo Sucrose RaffinoseStachyose Stachyose) 4/4 3568973.7 ± 1408264.7 1045112.8 ± 641756.9  3967517 ± 2900645.5 1.02 ± 0.8  4/5 2856327.7 ± 707852.7   904544 ±521259.0 3557979.3 ± 1715496.3 0.88 ± 0.7  4/7 2877070.1 ± 873920.3 717643.3 ± 609431.0 3009836.7 ± 2407257.1  1 ± 0.4 4/1 2653179.9 ±1046953.1  709370 ± 379902.4 3876536.5 ± 1999692.2 0.77 ± 0.5  4/22857092.7 ± 742415.0  626307.5 ± 115743.8 3121925.9 ± 951294.5  0.76 ±0.08 4/6 3112203.2 ± 850601.7  754341.9 ± 262408.2  4601053 ± 1461924.70.61 ± 0.15 4/3 3282564.1 ± 1911513.1 706353.5 ± 428861.1 4602803.6 ±2261654.1 0.58 ± 0.17 3/3 2691493.3 ± 1538378.2 536062.6 ± 231855.52838255.8 ± 1048200.9 0.77 ± 0.32 3/1 2283160.5 ± 1089482.4 449773.1 ±229549.7  1983356 ± 1099495.3 1.44 ± 1.25 3/4 3375314.6 ± 805313.2 616473.8 ± 185309.4 3940545.5 ± 845544.6  0.76 ± 0.19 3/6 81106208.1 ±30013245.6 17813664.4 ± 9546497.2  101268706.9 ± 50277358.9  0.72 ± 0.143/2 89847214.2 ± 14908804.2 17040544.3 ± 5550687.9  88496699.5 ±34107697.8 1.05 ± 0.70 3/1 (repeat) 73558780.2 ± 35218563.3 17948085.3 ±14008680.2 73769338.2 ± 49942666.1 1.46 ± 1.51 3/5 68427093.9 ±20712691.0 13192646.4 ± 9066329.2   55486977 ± 36156784.6 1.24 ± 0.75

Of the 14 events analyzed, two were considered cosuppressed forUDP-glucose 4-epimerase (4/1 and 3/1). Both of these events have atleast 2 embryos that have a ratio greater than 2.0. Event 3/1 wasrepeated and both times exhibited cosuppression.

Various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown anddescribed herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art from theforegoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fallwithin the scope of the appended claims.

The disclosure of each reference set forth above is incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety.

1. An isolated polynucleotide comprising: (a) a nucleotide sequenceencoding a polypeptide having UDP-galactose 4-epimerase activity,wherein the polypeptide has an amino acid sequence of at least 95%sequence identity, based on the Clustal V method of alignment, whencompared to SEQ ID NO:20; or (b) a full-length complement of thenucleotide sequence of (a).
 2. The polynucleotide of claim 1, whereinthe amino acid sequence of the polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO:20. 3.The polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the nucleotide sequence comprisesSEQ ID NO:19.
 4. A vector comprising the polynucleotide of claim
 1. 5. Arecombinant DNA construct comprising the polynucleotide of claim 1operably linked to at least one regulatory sequence.
 6. A method fortransforming a cell, comprising transforming a cell with thepolynucleotide of claim
 1. 7. A cell comprising the recombinant DNAconstruct of claim
 5. 8. A method for producing a transgenic plantcomprising transforming a plant cell with the polynucleotide of claim 1and regenerating a transgenic plant from the transformed plant cell. 9.A plant comprising the recombinant DNA construct of claim
 5. 10. A seedcomprising the recombinant DNA construct of claim 5.